To Bill or Not to Bill: Is Hosting Presidential Campaign Visits the Cost of Democracy in America?

Communities across the United States generally do not raise the issue of cost or reimbursement when a sitting president or a political candidate running for president comes to visit, whether that visit is an official state visit or a campaign stop. Some do. Newport Beach, CA recently raised the issue with both the Romney and Obama presidential campaigns. Burlington, VT and South Burlington, VT sent invoices earlier this year to the Obama campaign for campaign-related public safety services. Stratham, NH recently billed the Romney campaign. Durham requested reimbursement from the Obama campaign in June. And in the coming days, Windham and Rochester, NH will deal with the issue.

Communities in Congressman Paul Ryan’s home state of Wisconsin, a battleground state like New Hampshire, have struggled with the cost of hosting presidential campaign visits. However, the International City/County Management Association (ICMA)indicates that attention has simply not been devoted to this issue to date on a national level.

A presidential campaign visit is an honor for residents. It can potentially raise the profile of a community within a region or a state. It can bring hundreds of staff and thousands of possible supporters to an area with a net positive economic impact. It can bring the office of the presidency, regardless of party affiliation, within reach of local community members. Prominent local, state, and Federal officials are afforded a very public opportunity to see and be seen hosting or spending time with the president. Public safety officials are brought in on overtime, which is viewed positively by local rank and file public safety personnel. And despite being a candidate, the individual in office is still the president who legitimately needs special protection. As we well know, there have been numerous attempted and successful assassination attempts on the president in United States history. Local support of public safety services related to hosting the cost of a presidential visit, whether an official visit or a campaign event, in these terms is perhaps the cost of democracy in America.

However, not all regions experience an economic boon when the president as candidate comes to visit. Roadways are closed. Parking is restricted. Local business is interrupted. Residents are inconvenienced. Municipal resources must be redirected, and often significant unanticipated local tax dollars are expended on a purely partisan political event, the full cost of which is almost certainly unknown by the general public within the host community, not to mention the neighboring communities that provide public safety support. This may mean that worthy projects that survived the scrutiny of an annual budget process in a community are foregone to offset unanticipated public safety overages associated with a presidential campaign visit. In this light, local communities and counties across the United States could legitimately be viewed as subsidizing the cost of professionally managed multi-million dollar political campaigns that desire to reserve their resources for purely partisan purposes.

An incumbent President’s campaign is expected to reimburse the government the cost of a first class commercial airline ticket for each person riding Air Force One to or from a political event. The question, then, is not so much whether a given community should bill or not, but rather whether the present system of locally underwriting presidential campaign visits for either party is understood by residents in communities across America, and whether there is an opportunity to alter it given that both major political parties in the United States benefit from it often at the expense of local budgets and local taxpayers.

Todd I. Selig has been Durham Town Administrator since 2001.

Author: Todd Selig

Share This Post On
468 ad
  • C. dog e. doG

    If we stop subsidizing their pomp and circumcision, will they just go away and leave us alone?
    – C. dog looking to make cuts

  • Richard Whitney

    What we are mostly talking about is traffic control. The Secret Service handles the security but requests local police and fire personel to be available for traffic duty. The overtime cost of this should not be covered by the local towns. It is and should be a campaign expense. If I had a wedding or some other event, like a bike race, that needed traffic control I am charged by the town for that special detail. I see no difference with a potitical campaign. If they need local services they should pay for them just as we have to.